|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
EDA software + development tools
|
|
|
Engineering tutorials, courses
|
| |


All Engineering and Technical information in one place.....
Continuation from DMAIC tools
Measure:
Fully understand the actual state, quantify and measure all key parameters, elements and deliverables to be improved.
1-
2-
involved.
3-
4-
Example: Number of customers complaint calls, number or percent of returned products, number of defective units on a specific
production area per unit of time or period, process time.
5-
road blocks. Tag these as opportunities for improvement.
Analyze:
1-
2-
3-
4-
added activities but necessary such as QC inspection, filing and recording documentation, etc
5-
6-
7-
Improve:
1-
organization
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
Control:
Now that all these improvements have been implemented, now the main task will be to maintain and control what has been gained.
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
Y1
X2
Process (P)
Input
Output
X2 = f(Y1) + f(P)
FMEA is for “Failure Mode and Effect Analysis”
This methodology was originally developed by the US Military in the late 1940’s as a method to improve the weapons and military systems to analyze and avoid costly and fatal failures. Due to it’s simplicity and affectivity it has been almost generally adopted by all companies around the world as failure preventive methodology and as a products and services improvement tool.
This a very useful tool in the course of designing, improving or finding failure modes on products and services that were not evident from the original design or manufacturing process. FMEA focuses on finding the real or potential causes for failures and the effects that these failures can or could induce.
FMEA Types
There are many types of FMEA depending on their specific functional deployment and here are some of them:
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
FMEA Methodology
In General the FMEA analysis method involves these steps and in this order:
1-
2-
3-
4-
5-
6-
7-
8-
9-
10-
|
FAILURE MODES AND EFFECT ANALYSIS | |||||||||||
|
Product name __________________________ Prepared by: _______________________ Page _______ of _______
Process name: __________________________ Leader: _____________________________
Responsible: ____________________________ Start date _____________ Estimated finish time __________ | |||||||||||
|
Process Under Study
What is under study? |
Potential Failure Mode
In what ways the inputs can go wrong? |
Potential Failure Effects
What can happen if the input variables are affected?
|
Severity
How severe is the effect ? |
Potential Causes
What are the causes that affect the inputs? |
Occurrence
How often this is happening or likely to happens? |
Current Controls
What are the current controls ? |
Detection
How effective are the failure detection filters ? |
RPN
|
Actions Recommended
What actions are the best to resolve the problem ? |
Responsibility
Who will be responsible? |
Actions Taken
What action were actually taken date and details? |
|
Preparation of a composite material for aircraft winds
|
*Improper Mix
* Bad quality of materials |
Cracks on material could result on structure failure |
10 |
*Resin dispenser out of calibration
*Expired materials
*Improper preparation instruction s.
|
2
2
1 |
Calibration control sheet
Visual inspection of expiration dates of materials on process, shelf and stock
Process control sheet |
3
9
1 |
50
180
10 |
Verify twice the calibration procedure using two different calibration equipment
Establish a in/out control record directly into each material box
Review and update the process instruction sheets to make it fool proof
|
Production operator and supervisor (Names) Starting date
Production operator and supervisor (Names) Starting date
Manufacturing Engineering (Names) Starting date |
The process sheet now call to make two calibrations a day using two different machines
All materials boxes and cans were labeled to clearly state expiration dates
All involved process instructions sheets were reviewed and updated |